Bogomil Balkansky’s Post

View profile for Bogomil Balkansky, graphic

Partner at Sequoia Capital

The question I hear most from founders during Sequoia Capital's Arc program is about #pricing. Pricing is one of the most underutilized levers for startups. Why does it matter so much? It has the most direct impact on revenue, and the moment you establish your pricing, you determine your TAM. Getting the pricing metric right is, by far, the most important one. The key is to imagine the future: when you are a large and successful company, how have you changed the world, and what metric correlates best with your success? Hitch your financial wagon to that metric! If you are Figma, success is all designers using the app; therefore, the pricing metrics is per designer seat. If you are VMware, success is all workloads run in virtual machines; therefore, the right pricing metric would have been a virtual machine. A pricing metric is like the genie in a bottle: once you get it out, it is tough to rein it back or change it. The pricing model is about when and how frequently you charge. Recurrent subscriptions are the predominant model for SaaS apps, and usage-based pricing is the model for infrastructure solutions. Usage-based pricing creates a beautiful alignment of incentives but is less predictable. Upfront credit purchases and commitments are efforts to make usage-based practice more aligned with the rigid corporate budgeting processes. You can be the premium solution or the affordable one. Both are legitimate approaches. But your pricing needs to be consistent with the rest of your strategy: with your product and distribution channels.  You can’t have an affordable solution distributed through an expensive enterprise sales force. In this case, you need to sell either online or through inside sales—the product better be simple and the sales cycle quick. Many technical founders are shy about asking for a lot of money for their product. Don’t be. If customers like the product and it delivers value, they will gladly pay for it. Unless you hear customer complaints that you are expensive, then for sure you are underpricing. Calculate the ROI of your product, and take 20% of that value as your price point. How much it costs you to build the solution should not guide your pricing. But you should do a sanity check that you have a decent gross margin. Most companies start by selling a single package. Over time, they realize that different customer segments have different maturity levels and willingness to pay. To price discriminate between these segments, you need to introduce multiple packages.  Start by creating a customer maturity curve to inform your decisions on how many packages you need. The trick is to have the smallest number of packages to cover the broadest range of customer needs. Your packages will change and evolve quickly as your product matures. 

  • No alternative text description for this image
Bogomil Balkansky

Partner at Sequoia Capital

6mo

Listen to the Crucible Moments podcast episodes about Eventbrite and HubSpot for some cautionary tales about changing pricing. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crucible-moments/id1705282398

Bogomil Balkansky

Partner at Sequoia Capital

6mo

Final words of wisdom: Keep it simple.  Make your pricing easily measurable. Customers should be able to calculate how much it will cost them in their heads.  Make it predictable; avoid surprises for your customers.

Thomas Jensen

SaaS monetization expert and leader

6mo

Great post, Bogomil. Hits on the most important questions to consider. The most important advice to founders may be, "Keep raising your price until you get thrown out of the room - that means you've found the willingness-to-pay level." I would also add a caveat for those considering consumption-based pricing: Make sure to choose a metric that aligns with your own IP and not the underlying infrastructure. It's may be easy to price on processing time or data volume, but your pricing should not look like you're just reselling AWS, Azure or Snowflake with a markup (unless that's your business model).

Giovanni Hobbins

Co-founder at Schematic

6mo

Awesome framing Bogomil Balkansky. To go a step further, we think your last column, packaging (before you even get into pricing considerations), is a place where companies lose a lot of time and money making homegrown tooling to manage entitlements. The daily work of managing customers - upgrade/downgrade, bundling/unbundling features, managing customer specific exceptions, and providing UX to the user for managing their plan - is all getting built in-house and being handled by engineers manually. We've heard of companies spending months and 100s of thousands of R&D dollars building internal tooling to solve for this as their customers and GTM teams demand more flexible packaging. We think packaging and entitlements should be abstracted away so builders can focus on what's core to their product but still offer the granularity and flexibility you need to go to market nimbly. That's why we're building Schematic.

Alex David

Founder @ Corrily | Startup Advisor | GTM nerd

6mo

I like this a lot Bogomil! Both the tactical nature and broad coverage. One thing I would add: your value (and thus pricing) does not exist in a vacuum and is very much relative to the environment you are in. Understanding the market you are in and the alternatives to your solution (whether its a competitor or just a manual process) is critical in positioning your value and being able to assess the commensurate price. This matters especially as you grow because your pricing (metric, packaging, model, and level) should evolve as your product does. Most companies don't charge today the same way they did 5 years ago, and thats not always because their pricing was bad. The market and your positioning changes, and so your pricing should adapt!

Filippo Livorno

Building something new | Co-Founder & CEO @ E-leads (Acquired by Advice Group) | UIAGM Mountain Guide

6mo

"Unless you hear customer complaints that you are expensive, then for sure you are underpricing". But if they complain and still are willing to pay, are you probably still underpricing?

Great post Bogomil Balkansky! Love seeing more content on pricing and packaging. A few brief notes and learnings from our experience at Metronome helping companies through multiple pricing and packaging transitions: - Look at your comps: Pricing and packaging (P&P) is contextual. you'll always be compared to something (direct competitors, better-established companies in adjacent industries). This usually depends on industry maturity and what other products your buyer is familiar with. Your P&P must be compelling given that comparison, and can't be too divergent from market norms. - Build for change: Companies (especially early-stage ones) iterate frequently on P&P. It takes time and effort to converge on the right mix. Custom or bad billing inhibits iteration by requiring engineering work every time you make a pricing change, or every time an enterprise customer wants bespoke terms. - Make it understandable: It's very easy to come up with a list of 100 things you want your P&P to optimize for. It's much harder to pare that down to the handful that you actually need. The most common mistake that we see companies making is releasing P&P that's too complex, and having to roll it back because the customer doesn't understand it.

Alex Babar

VP @ Brinqa | Speaker | Tennis Nut

6mo

Bogomil Balkansky can you elaborate on this: "Calculate the ROI of your product, and take 20% of that value as your price point." I've found very little research on this topic. Do you know of any materials or benchmarks similar to what you say here re: price based on a percentage of value delivered. In particular, pros and cons of different ratios between those two figures.

Peter Wei

Vice President - Customer Success, Product Marketing, Operations

6mo

Bogomil Balkansky, spot on. The wrong pricing is like dragging around a heavy baggage. It can anchor your company on an old and dying metric. You may miss the true growth lever and the new fork in the market. Even if you realize it later, you may expend a huge amount of effort and money migrating customer entitlements just to get back to ground zero. Spend the time upfront and be thoughtful. Set it up right. You want to spend your company's energy and focus on growth, not on financial reengineering.

Rachel Braun

Creating and Connecting in Tech, Investing, and Venture Capital.

6mo

Who was the designer for this graphic? I really like it.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics